TURKEY – NATO'S AMBASSADOR IN NAGORNO KARABAKH?

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.17721/1728-2292.2021/2-54/21-25

Keywords:

Nagorno Karabakh, Turkey, NATO, OSCE Minsk Group, Russia

Abstract

It was in full swing of the 2020 newly-blown Nagorno Karabakh war when during an online press conference following the meetings of NATO Defense Ministers its Secretary General Jens Stoltenberg openly denoted Turkey as the one expected to "use its considerable influence in the region to calm tensions". Amid Armenia's accusations of Ankara allegedly playing a negative role in the conflict, this was a living testament of Turkey being a "valued Ally" of NATO. Pushing a political solution to the conflict, in which NATO was though not part in and around, the Alliance apparently sought to "level the playing field" within the Minsk Process, whose activity was never effective. The peace efforts of the OSCE Minsk Group, co-chaired by Russia and two powerful NATO allies – France and the United States, proved to be obsolete and unhelpful in the long-standing territorial dispute between Yerevan and Baku. Somehow, inserting Turkey into this configuration of powers consequently managed to bring some stability to the region. This study aims at investigating how comes that Russia "sanctioned" having Turkey, another NATO member, as a "certified" player on the field and that Armenia-favoring France let engage the country which has even no diplomatic relations with Yerevan. It concludes consequently that self-positioning of Turkey as a non-conventional NATO ally pursuing an autonomous foreign and security policy has been a critical factor.

References

NATO (2020). Remarks by NATO Secretary General Jens Stoltenberg at the joint press conference with the Minister of Foreign Affairs of Turkey, Mevlüt Çavuşoğlu. North Atlantic Treaty Organization. Retrieved from https://www.nato.int/cps/en/natohq/opinions_178528.htm?selectedLocale=en

Winrow, G. (2000). Turkey and the Caucasus: Domestic Interests and Security Concerns. Royal Institute of International Affairs, 67 pages

Carley, P. (1998). Nagorno-Karabakh: Searching for a Solution: a United States Institute of Peace Roundtable Report. U.S. Institute of Peace, 31 (25), 30 pages

Blank, S., Johnsen, W. & Pelletiere, S. (2002). Turkey's Strategic Position at the Crossroads of World Affairs. The Minerva Group, Inc., 148 pages

Larrabee, S. (2008). Turkey as a U.S. Security Partner. Rand Corporation, 48 pages

Punsmann, B. (2013). Implications of Turkish-Azerbaijani Relations for Regional Security and Development. Istituto affari internazionali, 12 pages

Gordon, P. & Taspinar, Ö (2009). Winning Turkey: How America, Europe, and Turkey Can Revive a Fading Partnership. Brookings Institution Press, 115 pages

Lansford, T. (2021). Political Handbook of the World 2020-2021. CQ Press, 2152 pages

IISS (2021). Armed Conflict Survey 2021. Routledge, 365 pages

Insight Turkey (2021). New Geopolitics in The Eastern Mediterranean. SET Vakfı İktisadi İşletmesi, Winter

Visual Explainer (2021). The Nagorno-Karabakh Conflict: A Visual Explainer. International Crisis Group. Retrieved from https://www.crisisgroup.org/content/nagorno-karabakh-conflict-visual-explainer

Ipek, P. (2009). Azerbaijan's Foreign Policy and Challenges for Energy Security. Middle East Journal, 63 (2), 227-239, p. 229. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/25482635

OSCE (1995). Mandate of the Co-Chairmen of the Conference on Nagorno Karabakh under the auspices of the OSCE ("Minsk Conference"). Organization for Security and Co-operation in Europe. Retrieved from https://www.osce.org/files/f/documents/f/f/70125.pdf

Papazian, S. (2019). The Cost of Memorializing: Analyzing Armenian Genocide Memorials and Commemorations in the Republic of Armenia and in the Diaspora. International Journal for History, Culture and Modernity, 7 (1), 55-86, p. 69. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.18352/hcm.534

Cheterian, V. (2010). History, Memory, and International Relations: The Armenian Diaspora and Armenian-Turkish Relations. Relations Internationales, 141 (1), 25-45, p. 26. Retrieved from https://www.cairnint.info/journal-relations-internationales-2010-1-page-25.htm

Wilkins, C. (2021). 'Erdogan, Assassin,' shout French Armenians on genocide anniversary amid security concerns. France 24. Retrieved from https://www.france24.com/en/france/20210425-erdogan-assassin-shoutfrench-armenians-on-genocide-anniversary-amid-security-concerns

Nixey, J. (2010). The South Caucasus: Drama on three stages. In America and a changed world: A question of leadership, ed. R. Niblett, 125- 42, p. 129

Johny, S. (2017). Who is Recep Tayyip Erdogan and how did he rise to absolute power in Turkey. The Hindu. Retrieved from https://www.thehindu.com/news/international/who-is-recep-tayyip-erdoganand-how-did-he-rise-to-absolute-power-in-turkey/article18191091.ece

U.S. Government Publishing Office. Statement by Press Secretary Fitzwater on the President's Telephone Conversation With Prime Minister Suleyman Demirel of Turkey. Public Papers of the Presidents of the United States: George H. W. Bush, Book I, 438-439. Retrieved from https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/PPP-1992-book1/html/PPP-1992-book1-doc-pg438-2.htm

Valiyev, A. & Mamishova, N. (2019). Azerbaijan's foreign policy towards Russia since independence: compromise achieved. Southeast European and Black Sea Studies, 19 (2), 269-291, p. 274. Retrieved from https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/14683857.2019.1578053

Kirvelyte, L. (2012). The dilemma of Azerbaijan's security strategy: Energy policy or territorial integrity? Lithuanian Annual Strategic Review, 10 (1), 199-233, p. 201. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.2478/v10243-012-0017-0

Starr, F. & Cornell, S. (2005). The Baku-Tbilisi-Ceyhan pipeline: Oil window to the west. Central Asia-Caucasus Institute and Silk Road Studies Program. Retrieved from https://www.silkroadstudies.org/resources/pdf/Monographs/2005_01_MONO_Starr-Cornell_BTC-Pipeline.pdf

Global Firepower (2021). 2021 Military Strength Ranking. Global Firepower. Retrieved from https://www.globalfirepower.com/countries-listing.php

Keddie, P. (2020). What's Turkey's role in the Nagorno-Karabakh conflict? Al Jazeera. Retrieved from https://www.aljazeera.com/features/2020/10/30/whats-turkeys-role-in-the-nagorno-karabakh-conflict

Pamuk, H. & Emmott, R. (2021). Turkey pushed NATO allies into softening outrage over Belarus plane, diplomats say. Reuters. Retrieved from https://www.reuters.com/world/exclusive-turkey-pushed-natoallies-into-softening-outrage-over-belarus-plane-2021-05-27/

Council of the EU (2020). Belarus: Declaration by the High Representative on behalf of the European Union on the so-called 'inauguration' of Aleksandr Lukashenko. Council of the European Union. Retrieved from https://www.consilium.europa.eu/en/press/press-releases/2020/09/24/belarus-declaration-by-the-high-representative-on-behalf-of-theeuropean-union-on-the-so-called-inauguration-of-aleksandr-lukashenko/#

Bensaid, A. (2020). The real reasons behind US opposition to Turkey's S-400 purchase. TRT World. Retrieved from https://www.trtworld.com/magazine/the-real-reasons-behind-us-opposition-to-turkey-s-s-400-purchase-42381

Erdemir, A. (2021). Turkey Undermines NATO, Yet Again. The Globalist. Retrieved from https://www.theglobalist.com/turkey-underminesnato-yet-again/

Tuysuz, G. (2020). NATO allies are facing off in the Eastern Mediterranean. The conflict could entangle the entire region. CNN. Retrieved from https://edition.cnn.com/2020/08/25/europe/greeceturkey-eastern-mediterranean-tension-intl/index.html

Marcus, J. (2020). The Eastern Mediterranean tinderbox: Why Greek-Turkish rivalries have expanded. BBC. Retrieved from https://www.bbc.com/news/world-europe-53906360

Waal, T. (2021). Unfinished Business in the Armenia-Azerbaijan Conflict. Carnegie Europe. Retrieved from https://carnegieeurope.eu/2021/02/11/unfinished-business-in-armenia-azerbaijan-conflict-pub-83844

Downloads

Published

2021-12-23

How to Cite

TURKEY – NATO’S AMBASSADOR IN NAGORNO KARABAKH?. (2021). Вісник: Міжнародні відносини, 54(2), 21-25. https://doi.org/10.17721/1728-2292.2021/2-54/21-25