GEOPOLITICAL POSITIONING OF UKRAINE AND POLANDIN THE BALTIC – BLACK SEA REGION IN THE CONTEXTOF THEIR FOREIGN POLICY IDENTIFICATION
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.17721/1728-2292.2024/2-59/11-16Keywords:
Зовнішньополітична ідентичність, геополітичні інтереси, зовнішня політика, Україна, Польща, Балтійсько-Чорноморський регіонAbstract
Background. The outline and detailed analysis of the geopolitical positioning of Ukraine and Poland in the Baltic – Black Sea Region in the context of foreign policy identification of the states as regional leaders and key ‘poles' of the geopolitical matrix of this space are important in the process of determining the degree of influence of these countries at the regional level, identifying the main points of intersection of their foreign policy interests and identities and determining their potential to establish bilateral and multilateral interactions at the current stage.
Methods. In the preparation of the study, the authors used the following methods: systemic approach, comparative method, structural and functional method, world–system analysis. The geopolitical aspect of the methodology is represented by the geopolitical analysis of security problems through foreign policy and geography, as well as the methods of analysis and assessment of the geopolitical situation.
Results. It was found that the geographical affiliation to the European subcontinent and the strategic importance of Ukraine's foreign policy development for building a new configuration of not only regional, but also global systems of international relations have secured its status as the main driving force of transformations of the geopolitical situation in Europe. Considerable attention to the ‘Ukrainian issue' in the context of Russia's full-scale invasion of the territory of Ukraine contributes to the realization of Poland's desire to establish its status of a geopolitical leader in the Baltic – Black Sea Region because Poland is one of the pioneers in providing assistance to the official Kyiv and acts as the latter's ‘international advocate'. Since the Baltic – Black Sea Region should not fall under control of any extra-regional actor, while establishing further practical mutually beneficial cooperation, Ukraine and Poland may realize that their common interests in confronting geopolitical challenges allow them to strengthen the significance of their geopolitical leadership in the Baltic – Black Sea Region in the context of their foreign policy identification.
Conclusions. Considering that Poland has acted as a transit territory for Western European influences in Ukraine for a long time, it is determined that close cooperation of the states as key ‘poles' of the geopolitical matrix of the Baltic – Black Sea Region will ensure the stability of this geopolitical area by establishing its interconnections with the wider geopolitical spaces not only in Europe, but also in the world as a whole.
References
Герасимчук, С. (2019, 27 червня). Бухарест 9: у пошуках співпраці на східному фланзі НАТО? УКРАЇНСЬКА ПРИЗМА: Рада зовнішньої політики. http://prismua.org/бухарест-9-у-пошуках-співпраці-на-східн/
Давимука, О. О. (2021). Стратегічна оцінка сучасних загроз безпеці державами Балто-Чорноморського регіону. Науковий журнал «Політикус», 2, 93–99.
Демчишак, Р. (2022). Російсько-українська війна як фактор геополітичного позиціонування регіону ЦСЄ та ПСЄ. Вісник Львівського університету. Серія філос.-політолог. студії, 43, 247–254.
Коршук, Р. М., Петренко, І. І., Салтовський, О. І., Федорченко, В. М. (2022). Питання геополітичних союзників України у вітчизняній політичній думці першої половини ХХ сторіччя. Політичне життя, 3, 7–13.
Магда, Є. (2022, 17 грудня). Як агресія Росії змінила партнерство Польщі та України. ГЛАВКОМ. https://glavcom.ua/columns/yemagda/jak-ahresija-rosiji-zminila-partnerstvo-polshchi-ta-ukrajini-896077.html
Мазуренко, А. (2022, 30 листопада). У Росії знову марять про те, що Польща хоче анексувати частину України. УКРАЇНСЬКА ПРАВДА. HTTPS://WWW.PRAVDA.COM.UA/NEWS/2022/11/30/7378638/
Турчин, Я., Дорош, Л. (2017). Балто-Чорноморський союз як варіант регіональної безпекової системи для України. В «25 років Договору між Україною і Республікою Польща про добросусідство, дружні відносини і співробітництво: спроба балансу»: Матеріали ІІІ Українсько-польського наукового форуму, м. Ольштин – Львів, 11-12 травня 2017 р. (с. 53–57). Видавництво НУЛП i INP UWM.
Baiduk, R. (2017). Kresy Wschodnie or the Partner in the Eastern Neighborhood: Modern Polish Popular Perception of Ukraine. International Crimes and History, 18, 101–126.
Biscop, S. (2023). War for Ukraine and the Rediscovery of Geopolitics: Must the EU Draw New Battlelines or Keep an Open Door? Egmont Paper, 123. Brussels: Royal Institute for International Relations.
Horbulin, V. et al. (2016). Donbas and Crimea: Return at What Price? Kyiv: National Institute for Strategic Studies.
Hrabyk, K. (1944). Co to jest Międzymorze. Papiery Klaudiusza Hrabyka, sygn. 16314/II, 9–13.
Kuzio, T. (2022). Russian Nationalism and the Russian-Ukrainian War. Autocracy-Orthodoxy-Nationality. Routledge.
Łada, A. (2017). Poland in Europe – Regional Leader or Outlier? Poland’s European Policy in View of the Changes on the Continent. Institute of Public Affairs.
Lanoszka, A. (2020). Poland in a Time of Geopolitical Flux. Contemporary Politics, 4(26), 458–474.
Larrabee, S. F. (1996). Ukraine’s Place in European and Regional Security. Harvard Ukrainian Studies, 20: Ukraine in the World: Studies in the International Relations and Security Structure of a Newly Independent State, 249–270.
Neumann, I. (1994). A Region-Building Approach to Northern Europe. Review of International Studies, 1(20), 53–74.
Nałęcz, D. (2019). The Evolution and Implementation of the Intermarium Strategy in Poland: A Historical Perspective. In O. Kushnir (Ed.), The Intermarium as the Polish-Ukrainian Linchpin of Baltic – Black Sea Cooperation (pp. 1–21). Cambridge Scholars Publishing.
Polegkyi, O. (2021). The Intermarium in Ukrainian and Polish Foreign Policy Discourse. East/West: Journal of Ukrainian Studies, 2(VIII), 29–48.
Potulski, J. (2014). Polish Geopolitical Visions. Poland as Intermarium. In V. Mihaylov (Ed.), Territories as Identities in Central, Eastern and Southeastern Europe (pp. 175–189). Instytut Geopolityki.
Sokolsky, R. (2016, 29 June). Not Quiet on NATO’s Eastern Front. Carnegie Endowment for International Peace. http://carnegieendowment.org/2016/06/29/not-quiet-on-nato-seasternfront-pub-63984. Accessed 14 May 2021
Starzyk, A., Tomaszewska, N. (2017). Conception of Intermarium in Polish Foreign Policy in XXI Century. Torun International Studies, 10(1), 15–28.
Swistek, G., Paul, M. (2023). Geopolitics in the Baltic Sea Region: The ‘Zeitenwende’ in the Context of Critical Maritime Infrastructure, Escalation Threats and the German Willingness to Lead. SWP Comment, 9. Berlin: Stiftung Wissenschaft und Politik – SWP – Deutsches Institut für Internationale Politik und Sicherheit. https://www.ssoar.info/ssoar/bitstream/handle/document/86803/ssoar-2023-swistek_et_al-Geopolitics_in_the_Baltic_Sea.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=y&lnkname=ssoar-2023-swistek_et_al-Geopolitics_in_the_Baltic_Sea.pdf
Szelachowska, K. (2016, 11 January). The Revival of Intermarium – Poland Can Talk the Talk but Can It Walk the Walk? Defence24.com. https://defence24.com/the-revival-of-intermarium-poland-can-talk-the-talk-but-can-it-walk-the-walk
