A NEW TYPE OF RELATIONS BETWEEN MAJOR COUNTRIESAS A BASIS FOR BILATERAL RELATIONS BETWEEN CHINA AND THE USA
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.17721/1728-2292.2025/1-60/96-102Keywords:
Ключові слова: китайсько-американські відносини, дилема безпеки, відносини великих держав, геополітична конкуренція, дипломатична взаємодія, економічна взаємозалежність, міжнародна стабільність.Abstract
B a c k g r o u n d . The bilateral relationship between the People's Republic of China (PRC) and the United States of America (USA) is one of the
key elements of the modern system of international relations that affect global stability and security. Bilateral relations between the two countries
have come a long way from direct confrontation in the mid-20th century to gradual engagement and strategic cooperation. From 1949 to 1971,
ideological differences and the Cold War defined their policy as hostile, which was manifested in the US non-recognition of China, US support for
Taiwan, and military conflicts (the Korean War of 1950-1953). Despite the longstanding confrontation, after 1971, both countries began to adapt their
policies to economic and geopolitical challenges, culminating in the establishment of diplomatic relations in 1979. With Xi Jinping coming to power
in 2013, China proposed the concept of a "new type of relations between great powers" aimed at avoiding conflicts and promoting mutually beneficial
cooperation with the United States. However, the evolution of bilateral relations between the two countries in the period from 2013 to 2025
demonstrates the growth of strategic rivalry, which complicates the implementation of this model. In this regard, there is a need to analyze bilateral
relations between China and the United States through the prism of the security dilemma and assess the impact of the concept of "a new type of
relations between great powers" on China's foreign policy strategies and the dynamics of Sino-US relations.
M e t h o d s . The following methods were used: political analysis, content analysis, historical analysis, and the method of generalization.
R e s u l t s . The historical development of Sino-US relations shows clear stages of transformation and evolution. In the period from the mid-20th
century to 1971, relations can be characterised as confrontational, driven by ideological confrontation and the Cold War. The United States did not
recognise the PRC, supporting Taiwan, and the Korean War intensified hostility due to China's perception of US actions as a threat to its security.
From 1971 to 1989, there was a shift to cautious engagement, including ‘ping-pong diplomacy', Nixon's visit in 1972, and the signing of the Shanghai
Communiqué, which laid the groundwork for normalising relations between China and the United States. In 1979, the United States recognised the
PRC as the only legitimate government of China, although the issue of Taiwan remains a cornerstone of bilateral relations and controversy. The
period from 1990 to 2008 was characterised by economic interdependence, particularly after China's accession to the WTO in 2001, but political
tensions between the two countries still persisted. Xi Jinping's 2013 concept of a "new type of relations between major countries" included the
following key principles: no conflict, mutual respect, and mutually beneficial cooperation. It was intended to avoid the traditional confrontation
between the rising (China) and dominant (the United States) powers. However, the implementation of this model has faced challenges: the 2018 trade
war initiated by the United States through ‘Made in China 2025' has revealed economic rivalry and contradictions between China and the United
States, and China's actions in the South China Sea and around Taiwan have increased security tensions in the region. Based on this, the theoretical
analysis through the security dilemma and Thucydides' trap confirms that China's rise is perceived by the United States as a threat that has a decisive
impact on bilateral relations between the states.
C o n c l u s i o n s . Bilateral relations between China and the United States in the period from 2013 to 2025 demonstrate a transition from an
attempt to build a "new type of relations between great powers" to an escalation of strategic rivalry between the states due to the security dilemma.
Despite economic interdependence, differences in key strategic issues and interests, economic conflicts (such as trade wars) and security issues
(Taiwan and the South China Sea) have complicated the implementation of this concept. In the future, the development of relations between China
and the United States will depend on the ability of the states to find a balance between competition and cooperation in order to ensure global stability
and predictable bilateral cooperation.
References
Council on Foreign Relations ‘Timeline of U.S.-China Relations’ <https://www.cfr.org/timeline/us-china-relations>
United States Department of State, Office of the Historian, Foreign Service Institute ‘China Policy’ <https://history.state.gov/milestones/1977-1980/china-policy>
Naval History and Heritage Command (1990) ‘A New Equation: Chinese Intervention into the Korean War’ <https://www.history.navy.mil/research/library/online-reading-room/title-list-alphabetically/n/new-equation.html>
Weatherhead East Asian Institute Columbia University ‘U.S.-China Relations Since 1949’ <https://afe.easia.columbia.edu/special/china_1950_us_china.htm>
Woodrow Wilson International Center for Scholars Digital Archive ‘Sino-American Cooperation (1972-1989)’ <https://digitalarchive.wilsoncenter.org/topics/sino-american-cooperation-1972-1989>
China Internet Information Center China.org.cn (2001) ‘Joint Communique of the United States of America and the People's Republic of China (Shanghai Communique)’ http://www.china.org.cn/english/china-us/26012.htm
Encyclopædia Britannica, Inc. ‘Four Modernizations’ https://www.britannica.com/topic/Four-Modernizations
Reuters (2024) ‘China's Xi offers deep condolences over Jimmy Carter's death’ https://www.reuters.com/world/china-offers-deep-condolences-over-jimmy-carters-death-2024-12-30
Office of the United States Trade Representative Archive (2001) ‘Background Information on China’s Accession to the World Trade Organization’ <https://ustr.gov/archive/Document_Library/Fact_Sheets/2001/Background_Information_on_China%27s_Accession_to_the_World_Trade_Organization.html>
Congressional Research Service ‘China/Taiwan: Evolution of the “One China” Policy—Key Statements from Washington, Beijing, and Taipei’ https://www.everycrsreport.com/reports/RL30341.html
D.Dollar, The Brookings Institution ‘ (2018) U.S.-China trade war has its seeds in the financial crisis’ https://www.brookings.edu/articles/u-s-china-trade-war-has-its-seeds-in-the-financial-crisis
M.Masuda, The East Asia Forum (2016) ‘Why has Chinese foreign policy become more assertive?’ https://eastasiaforum.org/2016/02/20/why-has-chinese-foreign-policy-become-more-assertive
London School of Economics IDEAS and CIMB ASEAN Research (2018) ‘China’s Belt and Road Initiative (BRI) and Southeast Asia’ https://www.lse.ac.uk/ideas/Assets/Documents/reports/LSE-IDEAS-China-SEA-BRI.pdf
K. Lieberthal, The Brookings Institution (2011) ‘The American Pivot to Asia’ https://www.brookings.edu/articles/the-american-pivot-to-asia
Капітоненко М (2019). Теорія міжнародних відносин. Чернівці : Книги – ХХІ, 2019. 272 c
Herz, J. «Idealist Internationalism and the Security Dilemma», World Politics vol. 2, no. 2 (1950): 171—201,Published by Cambridge University Press) http://slantchev.ucsd.edu/courses/ps240/04%20Conflict%20with%20States%20as%20Unitary%20Actors/Herz%20-%20Idealist%20internationalism%20and%20the%20security%20dilemma.pdf
Jervis, R. (1978). ‘Cooperation under the Security Dilemma’ World Politics, 30(2), 167-214. JSTOR https://www.sfu.ca/~kawasaki/Jervis%20Cooperation.pdf
Kapitonenko, M. (2021). THE RISE OF CHINA: IMPACT ON INTERNATIONAL SECURITY. 10.53679/2616-9460.1-2.2021.09
Allison, G. (2017) ‘Destined for War: Can America and China Escape Thucydides’s Trap?’ https://archive.org/details/destinedforwarca0000alli_p4c4/page/n9/mode/2up
Thucydides (431 BCE). The History of the Peloponnesian War, in The Complete Works of Thucydides (Delphi Classics, 2013). https://archive.org/details/thcds/Thucydides%20-%20The%20History%20of%20the%20Peloponnesian%20War/The%20Complete%20Works%20of%20Thucydides%20%28Delphi%20Classics%2C%202013%29
The National People's Congress of the People's Republic of China, China Daily (2021) ‘Build a New Model of Major-Country Relationship Between China and the United States’< https://subsites.chinadaily.com.cn/npc/2021-12/11/c_688413.htm>
The Brookings Institution ‘Wang Yi: Toward a New Model of Major-Country Relations Between China and the United States’ https://www.brookings.edu/articles/wang-yi-toward-a-new-model-of-major-country-relations-between-china-and-the-united-states
D.Chen (2014), The Diplomat ‘Defining a ‘New Type of Major Power Relations’ https://thediplomat.com/2014/11/defining-a-new-type-of-major-power-relations/
J. Mcbride&A.Chatzky, Council on Foreign Relations (2019) ‘Is ‘Made in China 2025’ a Threat to Global Trade?’ https://www.cfr.org/backgrounder/made-china-2025-threat-global-trade
A. Khitakhunov (2020), The Eurasian Research Institute (n.d.) ‘U.S.-China Trade War: Economic Causes and Consequences’ https://www.eurasian-research.org/publication/us-china-trade-war-economic-causes-and-consequences
Center on China’s Economy and Institutions, Stanford University (2023) ‘How Did the 2018 U.S.-China Trade War Affect China’s Exporters?’ https://sccei.fsi.stanford.edu/china-briefs/how-did-2018-us-china-trade-war-affect-chinas-exporters
Council on Foreign Relations (2024) ‘Territorial Disputes in the South China Sea’ https://www.cfr.org/global-conflict-tracker/conflict/territorial-disputes-south-china-sea
Corporate Identities & CDEIU, CDE News (2025) ‘U.S. Warns China’s War Games Near Taiwan Could Be Used to Conceal Attack’ https://cde.news/u-s-warns-chinas-war-games-near-taiwan-could-be-used-to-conceal-attack
Center for Strategic and International Studies ‘Harnessing Progress: Strengthening the Indo-Pacific Through Alliances and Partnerships’ <https://www.csis.org/analysis/harnessing-progress-strengthening-indo-pacific-through-alliances-and-partnerships>