FROM SOFT POWER TO REPUTATIONAL SECURITY: FEATURES OF PUBLIC DIPLOMACY IN CONFLICT
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.17721/1728-2292.2025/1-60/29-35Keywords:
публічна дипломатія, м’яка сила, показники ефективності ПД, розумна сила, жорстка сила, гостра сила, репутаційна безпекаAbstract
Introduction. In recent decades, public diplomacy (PD) has undergone significant changes under the influence of transformations in international relations, information technologies, and the growing role of non-state actors. Traditionally, the concept of soft power has been the background for PD since the end of the Cold War, but modern conflicts, hybrid wars, and the use of hard power have changed the dynamics of this process. The war in Ukraine has become an example of how PD tools are used not only for a positive image of the country but also to mobilize international support, counter disinformation, and ensure reputational security. The study's relevance is due to the need to analyze changes in the concepts of power (hard, soft, hard, smart) and their interaction through PD mechanisms. The article aims to systematize approaches to PD in conflict situations and develop key performance indicators based on levels of reputational security.
Methods. The study is based on an interdisciplinary approach, including the analysis of the concepts of hard, sharp, soft, and intelligent power, the theory of reputational security, and a comparative method was also used to compare approaches to the country's power and public diplomacy in conflict situations. These findings will help to identify effective strategies and practices used by different states.
Results. The article examines the relationship between hard, soft, and sharp powers, showing that their combination is necessary for effective foreign policy in konflict. The analysis proves that sharp power is used for manipulation and destabilization. In contrast, soft power contributes to long-term engagement and forming a positive image of the country, although it is ineffective in its pure form. It is determined that in military conflicts, PD changes the focus from traditional tools to crisis mechanisms, including information campaigns, international support mobilization, and counter-propaganda. The features of sharp and soft power are highlighted. The directions of PD in conflict conditions have been determined. PD key performance indicators have been developed based on levels of reputational security, which consider the degree of country recognition, the level of support from the international community, and mechanisms for countering disinformation.
Conclusions. Modern PD is no longer limited to soft power, but includes complex mechanisms for countering information threats and mobilizing allies. In conflict conditions, it is essential to combine short-term and long-term tools. Implementing the concept of reputational security allows us to assess the effectiveness of PD not only in terms of its impact on the target audience but also in terms of the state's ability to resist information attacks and strengthen international support. This will help develop a comprehensive PD strategy that considers the multi-level nature of the information space and the dynamics of modern conflicts.
Keywords: public diplomacy, soft power, sharp power, hard power, smart power, reputational security, key performance indicators
References
Anholt, S. (2023, October 15). Soft power and public diplomacy in times of war [Video]. YouTube. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LE3THP5w0zk
Bjola, C., & Manor, I. (Eds.). (2024). The Oxford handbook of digital diplomacy. Oxford University Press.
Cull, N. J. (2019). The tightrope to tomorrow: Reputational security, collective vision and the future of public diplomacy. The Hague Journal of Diplomacy, 14, 21–35. https://doi.org/10.1163/1871191X-14011014
Cull, N. J. (2022). From soft power to reputational security: Rethinking public diplomacy and cultural diplomacy for a dangerous age. In B. J. C. McKercher (Ed.), The Routledge handbook of diplomacy and statecraft (2nd ed., pp. 409–419). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003016625
Cull, N. J. (2024). Reputational security: Refocusing public diplomacy for a dangerous world (1st ed.). Polity.
Gallarotti, G. M. (2010). The Power Curse: Influence and Illusion in World Politics; Cosmopolitan Power in International Relations: A Synthesis of Realism, Neoliberalism, and Constructivism. Cambridge University Press.
Gallarotti, G. M. (2011). Soft power: What it is, why it’s important, and the conditions for its effective use. Journal of Political Power, 4(1), 25–47. https://doi.org/10.1080/2158379X.2011.557886
Gallarotti, G. M. (2021). The changing face of power in international relations, 1979–2019. Journal of Political Power, 14(1), 209–234. https://doi.org/10.1080/2158379X.2021.1879573
Gilboa, E. (Ed.). (2023). A research agenda for public diplomacy. Cheltenham: Elgar.
Gilboa, E. (2024) Public diplomacy from global peace to global conflict. Place Brand Public Dipl 20 (Suppl 1), 21–24 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1057/s41254-024-00374-1
Gregory, B. (2024). American diplomacy’s public dimension: Practitioners as change agents in foreign relations. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
Henne, P. (2022). What We Talk About When We Talk About Soft Power, International Studies Perspectives, Volume 23, Issue 1, February 2022, Pages 94–111, https://doi.org/10.1093/isp/ekab007
Hlihor, E. (2024). Public diplomacy in time of war. Israel's war on Gaza case study. Bulletin of the Transilvania University of Braşov, Series VII: Social Sciences, Law, 17(66) No. 1. https://doi.org/10.31926/but.ssl.2024.17.66.1.13
Ikenberry, G. J., & Kupchan, C. A. (2004). Liberal realism: The foundations of a democratic foreign policy. The National Interest, 77(Fall), 38–49.
Konovalova, М.(2024) Humanitarian diplomacy as an instrument of the state's "soft power" / International relations and world politics: new trends in rethinking the past: collection of scientific works. Zaporizhzhia: ZNU, 2024. P.46-50. https://dspace.znu.edu.ua/jspui/handle/12345/19369 [In Ukrainian]
Kearn, D. W. (2022). The crisis of American soft power. Journal of Political Power, 15(3), 397–414. https://doi.org/10.1080/2158379X.2022.2127277
Lucas, E. & Pomerantsev, P. (2016). Winning the information war: techniques and counter-strategies against Russian propaganda in central and Eastern Europe. Washington, DC: Center for European Policy Analysis
MacDonogh, G. (2007). After the Reich: The brutal history of the Allied occupation. Basic Books.
Musk calls for the closure of Radio Liberty and Voice of America (2025) Ukrinform. https://www.ukrinform.ua/rubric-world/3958177-mask-zaklikae-zakriti-radio-svoboda-j-golos-ameriki.html [In Ukrainian]
Melissen, J. (2005). Wielding soft power: The new public diplomacy. The Hague: Netherlands Institute of International Relations ‘Clingendael’. Retrieved from https://culturaldiplomacy.org/academy/pdf/research/books/soft_power/Wielding_Soft_Power_-_The_New_Public_Diplomacy_-_Jan_Melissen.pdf
Mendez, L. (2025). U.S. Foreign aid: Marketization, social responsibility, and economic returns. Public Administration and Development, 45(1), 43-55. https://doi.org/10.1002/pad.2075
Nye, J. S. (1990). Bound to lead: The changing nature of American power. Basic Books.
Nye, J. S. (2004). Soft power: The means to success in world politics. Public Affairs.
Nye, J. S. (2008). Public diplomacy and soft power. The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 616, 94–109.
Nye, J. S. (2018). How sharp power threatens soft power: The right and wrong ways to respond to authoritarian influence. Foreign Affairs. Retrieved from https://archive-yaleglobal.yale.edu/content/foreign-affairs-how-sharp-power-threatens-soft-power.
Pamment, J., Fjällhed, A., & Smedberg, M. (2024). The ‘logics’ of public diplomacy: In search of what unites a multi-disciplinary research field. The Hague Journal of Diplomacy, 19(1), 49–83. https://doi.org/10.1163/1871191x-bja10161
Richmond, Y. (2008). Practicing public diplomacy: A Cold War odyssey. ADST-DACOR Diplomats and Diplomacy Book. Berghahn Books. https://doi.org/10.3167/9781845454753
Radin, A. (2017). Hybrid warfare in the Baltics: threats and potential responses. Santa Monica: Rand Corporation
Sheiko, V. (2022, March 18). “Cancel Russian culture” as a means of survival. Lb.ua. https://en.lb.ua/news/2022/03/18/11413_cancel_russian_culture_means.html
Snow, N. (2020). Rethinking public diplomacy in the 2020s. In N. Snow & N. Cull (Eds.), Routledge handbook of public diplomacy (pp. 3–12). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429465543
Searight, A. (2020). Countering China’s influence operations: Lessons from Australia. Center for Strategic and International Studies (CSIS). https://www.csis.org/analysis/countering-chinas-influence-operations-lessons-australia
Sonenshine, T. (2013, June 6). Public diplomacy's role at various stages of conflict resolution. Remarks at The Stimson Center, Washington, DC. U.S. Department of State, https://2009-2017.state.gov/r/remarks/2013/210355.htm
Szostek, J. (2020). What happens to public diplomacy during information war? Critical reflections on the conceptual framing of international communication. International Journal of Communication, 14, 2728–2748. https://ijoc.org/index.php/ijoc/article/view/13439
Sukhorolskyi, P. & Sukhorolska, I. (2024). The public diplomacy of Ukraine in wartime: a path to reputational security, Eastern Journal of European Studies, Centre for European Studies, Alexandru Ioan Cuza University, vol. 15, pages 268-291, October, DOI: https://doi.org/10.47743/ejes-2024-SI13
Trump shuts down USAID: who will suffer the most? (2024) Novoe Vremya.https://nv.ua/ukr/opinion/tramp-zakriv-usaid-hto-postrazhdaye-naybilshe-50488749.html [In Ukrainian]
Trunkos, J. (2021). Comparing Russian, Chinese and American soft power use: A new approach. Global Society, 35(3), 395–418. https://doi.org/10.1080/13600826.2020.1848809
Trunkos, J. (2022) Testing the impact of geopolitics on European democratic countries’ soft power use, Journal of Political Power, 15:3, 532-555, DOI:10.1080/2158379X.2022.2127279
Van der Veen, A. M. (2011). Ideas, interests and foreign aid. Cambridge University Press.10-45 https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511842177
Veebel, V., Ploom, I., & Sazonov, V. (2022). Russian information warfare in Estonia, and Estonian countermeasures. Lithuanian Annual Strategic Review, 19(1), 69-98. doi:10.47459/lasr.2021.19.4
Walker, C., Kalathil, S., & Ludwig, J. (2020). The cutting edge of sharp power. Journal of Democracy, 31(1), 124–137. https://doi.org/10.1353/jod.2020.0010
Walker, C., & Ludwig, J. (2017, November 16). The meaning of sharp power: How authoritarian states project influence. Foreign Affairs. Retrieved from https://www.foreignaffairs.com/articles/china/2017-11-16/meaning-sharp-power
